![]() I hope that it isn't a sign that NEC quality has taken a dip since I bought my display in 2012. The change to the NEC "problem pixel" warranty is unfortunate. It makes paying more much easier for me to swallow. A high-quality display is a joy to use and it can have a very long useful life. It's one bit of hardware where I do not care to compromise quality-wise. There is a lot of competition for customers who are price-sensitive when it comes to displays. It just make sense that BenQ must cut costs in order to be able to discount its displays so much. It's a common topic on display forums and more than a few Amazon customer reviews complain about uniformity problems as well. ![]() I haven't read any BenQ PV reviews but one online reviewer received different BenQ SW-series display models and both of them had serious uniformity issues. It would be very handy for a lot of prospective display buyers. If you happen to recall that website you mention I hope that you will post the URL. ![]() NEC publishes the details on a general info section of its website but individual displays specs leave out the 10-bit fine print. Yeah, it's unfortunate that most of the display companies aren't more forthcoming in this area. With NEC, the problem we have in Australia is they have huge dead pixel allowances for considering a display "in spec", compared to other manufacturers. Unfortunately they don't have a corrected 4k display yet. They have both Uniformity Corrected (PV Series) and non-corrected. There's a website (though i can't remember the address offhand) that tracks the stats for the specific panels used in different displays, which will tell you the true bit depth of a product. Likewise, I believe the LG TB3 display Apple was selling, was an 8+2 marketed as a 10. It's the same for a lot of manufacturers - Apple sold iMacs as "10" bit, when they had 8+2 displays. It doesn't say much for BenQ quality control. I also wonder about the longevity of BenQ panels when brand-new displays exhibit such problems. I understand the attraction of the BenQ displays for their features/price but I would rather pay more up front than take a chance of having to re-box and return a display to a seller. (NEC displays also have excellent luminance and color uniformity.) We're talking about a 25% luminance variation vs. Unfortunately, BenQ has a reputation for copy variability exhibiting insufficient luminance and color temperature uniformity that is visible to the eye and verified by testing. BenQ does not differentiate them in its specs "10 bit" is all the info that is provided in individual display specs I looked at. It would seem the Macbook's built in display is only 8+2.īenQ apparently has both true 10-bit and 8-bit + FRC (the SW320 for example). I don't know whether other companies offer true 10-bit displays.īenq does full 10 bit displays in their PV series, and the larger SW series (27" and above) Just want to note that NEC PA series displays are not true 10-bit. According to this article, Photoshop CC has supported 10-bit-per channel color for several years.īut a post from earlier this year claimed that "No version of Lightroom supports 10-bit color." Whether applications take advantage of it is a different matter. Up to four displays with 4096‑by‑2304 resolution at 60Hz at over a billion colors.Up to two displays with 6016‑by‑3384 resolution at 60Hz at over a billion colors.Simultaneously supports full native resolution on the built-in display at millions of colors and: If so, a reference would be great!Īpple's technical specifications page says this about the 16" model: Does anybody know if the 8GB GPU in the new MacBook Pro, the AMD Radeon Pro 5500M, supports 30 bit color? I'm considering the MacBook to use as a desktop for my NEC Monitor which is 30 bit.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |